I. Introduction to the problem
Main issues: Can trial results be transferred to clinical routine? What factors influence the transfer? If the trial results are not transferred, what effect does this have on clinical routine?
|
Implementing trial results in clinical practice - using cardiology as an example: drug-eluting stents (German) Prof. Dr. Rutsch |
|
|
Transferring trial results into daily practice Prof. Dr. med. Johannes Forster |
|
|
Can trial results from pharmacological interventions be transferred into daily practice? (German) Prof. Dr. med. Petra A. Thürmann |
|
|
Transferring trial results to health care Prof. Dr. H. Bauer |
II. Approaches to a solution
Main issue: How can we close the gap between trial results and their transfer to routine health care?
|
Transfer of health care results to everyday care - Various qualitative and quantitative research approaches (German) Prof. Dr. Karl Wegscheider |
|
|
GRADE System: from evidence to recommendation. Description of the system and proposal for transferability of trial results (German) Prof. Dr. Holger Schünemann |
|
|
Pragmatic trials within the setting of routine health care as a proposed solution (German) Prof. Dr. Norbert Donner-Banzhoff |
III. How benefit assessments and decisions are affected (discussion)
Main issues: What action should be taken in assessing benefit in health care when the external validity of trial results has received a negative assessment? If there is no transfer, does this have an impact on decisions in the health care system (Federal Joint Committee, G-BA)?
|
Introductory statement to discussion (German) PD Dr. med. Matthias Perleth, MPH |
Go to the GFR website for further information on the first joint discussion forum held by GFR and IQWiG on assessing benefit in the German health care system.
Booklet on the first discussion forum 'Definitions of the term benefit'

